PWCC, Probstein and PSA Targets Of New Class Action Lawsuit

All Vintage Cards content is free. When you purchase through referral links on our site, we earn a commission. Learn more

It was only a matter of time. Finally something is happening from a legality standpoint in regards to the latest card trimming scandal.

The class action lawsuit in question was filed this week in California and alleges that Collector’s Universe (aka PSA) ‘knowingly graded altered cards’ and that PWCC and Probstein ‘knowingly sold altered cards’.  

The lawsuit claims that due to the widespread nature of available information, PSA “knew or should have known that it was grading altered cards”.  This part of the argument is a bit light on substance.  

AVC Acquisitions Portal

Sell Your Card Collection

Skip the listing process and long wait times. Get a professional offer on your collection within 48 hours. See our buy list.

Step 1 of 3

33%

Your Name(Required)

First Last

Your Email Address(Required)

What Is The Era Of Your Collection?

Pre-War/Tobacco/Early Gum (1900-1930’s)

Golden Age / Early Topps & Bowman (1940-1959)

Standard Vintage (1960-1975)

Late Vintage to Mid-Eighties (1976-1986) includes Fleer and Star Basketball

Junk Wax Era (1987-1999)

Modern Sports Cards (2000 to Present)

Acquisition Criteria

For the 1987–1999 era, we are strictly seeking High-Grade PSA Rookies or Sealed Cases with a minimum value of $1,000. We do not acquire raw singles, sets or commons from this period.

Acquisition Criteria

Modern Acquisition Criteria (1995–Present): We are exclusively seeking PSA/SGC Graded 10s, Low-Numbered Autographs (/25 or less), or Rare Inserts of Tier-1 Hall of Famers and top-tier active Stars. We do not acquire raw base cards or modern “inserts” from this period.

Photo Upload Instructions

To give you an accurate value, please upload clear photos of the front and back of your 5-10 most valuable cards. For large sets, a few group shots are fine.

Reminder: Our acquisition team only responds to modern inquiries with a confirmed market value over $1,000.

Add Images Of Your Cards Here(Required)

Drop files here or Select files

Max. file size: 128 MB.

Are Any Cards Currently Graded?

Yes (PSA, SGC, BVG, etc)

No

Brief Description Of Your Cards(Required)

E.g., Complete 1956 Topps set, or a handful of T206 tobacco cards found in an attic.

What Is Your Primary Goal?

Immediate Cash Offer (Best for quick liquidity; usually 60-70% of market value)

Auction Brokerage / Consignment (Best for high-value collections to achieve maximum market price; handled via our verified auction partner).

Professional Appraisal (I just need to know what I have).

Phone Number (optional)

Only used if we need to clarify details about your collection for a firmer offer.

Target Price

If you have a specific number in mind, enter it here. Leave blank if unsure.

All Vintage Cards Newsletter

Yes, add me to the mailing list!

Δ

First, the lawsuit claims that given that PSA is an expert in the field of grading, they ‘should be able to identify indicia of alterations such as removal of stains and smoothing out of creases’.

This part I agree with.

PSA and other grading companies should be able to pick up on these alterations or trimming such as the recently discovered trimmed Goudey Ruth.  

Yet, the lawsuit also goes on to say this:

when a card is trimmed, it no longer fits perfectly into a PSA case. Trimmed cards can often be identified by a gap between the card and the edge of the case and they may even move within the case

This is most certainly not true in all cases, especially in the case of vintage cards which tend to have a lot of inconsistencies in regards to sizing and cuts.  The suit also claims this

PSA maintains a record of all the cards that it rates including pictures of those cards as well as a record of purchasers of PSA rated cards. 

I don’t know about this — do they?  I’ve never heard about PSA keeping records or photos of old cards for comparisons in regards to grading.  I mean they SHOULD, but I’m not sure how supportive this might be to the assertion that the ‘knowingly graded altered cards’.  

The allegations against PSA are going to be challenging to prove UNLESS there are witnesses that we aren’t aware of it.  All it takes is one rogue grader that has some sort of inside scoop.  Not saying this is even remotely true, but is an example of something needed that would give the plaintiff any chance of success.

PSA can argue all day that it’s methods aren’t fool proof, that despite the use of ‘expert’ authenticators and graders, it is bound to make some mistakes. 

Often times, these class action cases are squashed right from the start, so this might never even see the light of day.  However if it does proceed and discovery is allowed then it could get interesting.  PSA, PWCC and Probstein might be forced to hand over any pertinent internal records that could support the plaintiff’s case.

Now if somehow, someway the plaintiff does prevail, what might the potential ramifications for PSA?  That’s where it could get interesting, and costly.  Maybe PSA is forced to buy back all of the altered cards that they graded.  In addition, they might have to compensate customers for any grading fees incurred while these alleged activities were taking place.

Note that in it’s latest quarterly report, Collector’s Universe noted the following:

We believe that none of the lawsuits or disputes currently pending against the Company is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

It’s quite possible when they made this statement from their quarterly report (dated February 4th) they weren’t aware of this class action suit, or they were and didn’t really believe it had any merit. 

It’s way too early to predict if anything at all might come from this, but I think it’s a good thing that someone is at least doing something about this.