🌟 The Hobby This Week: PSA Acquisition, Star Jordans, and Vintage Insight
All Vintage Cards content is free. When you purchase through referral links on our site, we earn a commission. Learn more
|
The collectibles world is buzzing after PSA’s parent company, Collectors, completed its acquisition of Beckett, giving it ownership of three of the four major card grading brands and leaving only CGC standing independently. This move has huge implications for competition, pricing power, and choice in the hobby. Read our full breakdown — including what this means for collectors, grading fees, and the future of meaningful alternatives — right here:
One Card I’d Rather Own Than Cash Right Now1939 Goudey Premiums – Ted Williams
|
|
|
A Sale That Caught My Eye This Week
This 1984-85 Star Court Kings 5×7 Jordan sold for $18,500 at auction this week. This has long been one of my favorite cards and, in my opinion, one of the more underrated Star Jordan cards. Trends for this grade (BGS 8.5) had been hovering around $7K since the beginning of 2025. However, prices have been trending much higher, with one sale of a similar grade topping $20K back in October. I think the trends will continue higher here, and I’d recommend seeking this card out if possible.
|
|
|
|
A Reader Question On A Trimmed Card
I get a lot of reader questions about trimmed cards, and this one recently came my way – a T206 Sherry Magie error card.
The reader’s specific concern was whether the top edge of the card appeared to be trimmed.
|
|
The first thing to establish is an important limitation: it’s extremely difficult to determine trimming from photos alone. Grading companies rely on close inspection of edges, fiber breaks, and cutting patterns — things that simply can’t be confirmed from an image.
But what can we gather from this photo on its own?
The card in question is slabbed as ‘Authentic’ by SGC. I checked SGC’s website to look up the certificate number and found that the card was graded in 2015, which must be an error, as SGC moved to these black labels in 2018. Maybe a new holder? Possibly.
It’s also worth noting that prior to roughly 2021, SGC’s Authentic designation functioned as an umbrella grade.
An “A” label indicated something was off, but it did not specify why. In more recent years, SGC has added explicit notations (e.g., “Trimmed,” “Altered,” “Restored”) when assigning an Authentic grade. That was not always the case.
![]() |
Because of that historical context, it is entirely possible — and frankly common — for a card graded Authentic before those notations existed to have been trimmed or altered, even if the label does not say so.
But based on the card, an educated guess is that it was trimmed. In fact, the reader asked about the top of the card, but I think the left side was cut, as the border (despite the grainy image) looks slightly uneven to me. The card may have a slight diamond cut (from the factory), which could explain the uneven top and bottom borders.
In any case, the safest thing to assume with any card graded as ‘Authentic’ before any grading notations were included is that yes, the card was indeed trimmed or altered in some way.
As one longtime collector succinctly put it on the Net54 forums:
|
|
Thanks for reading and for being part of the AVC community.
Wishing you and your family a happy, healthy holiday season.
— Chris


